Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Critical Review

                                                   The Magnificent Budapest Hotel

The immense amount of mesmerizing detail put into The Grand Budapest Hotel by Wes Anderson makes it clear why it is a complex and award winning film. The Grand Budapest Hotel has every element you could possibly think of from side splitting comedy and cold blooded killers, to romance that warms your heart and mystery that keeps you guessing. For me, it has to be the stunning miniatures and detail in every nook and cranny that wins my stamp of approval.

The first scene is present day, and a girl is walking into a cemetery, then sits down to read a pink delicate looking book titled: The Grand Budapest Hotel. This is the first hint of detail that catches your eye. For a few short seconds there is a close up of the book and it has the hotel on it with “Grand Budapest Hotel” in big letters and the background is filled with the infamous cross keys all of the concierges’ seen throughout the movie have pins of.  When she opens the book a narrator chimes in who is also the author of the book, and it shows him doing an on camera interview speaking about the book in 1985. When the narrator begins telling his story the setting changes, and you are in a hotel lobby with a much younger version of himself when he begins enlightening us of his experience at The Grand Budapest Hotel in 1968.

In this time period the hotel is looking rather tacky and outdated, and the narrator begins to ask the bellhop about a man across the room reading the newspaper. He finds that this mystery, gray-bearded man is Mr. Moustafa and he stays in the same cramped, corner room every few months. The next day Mr. Moustafa approaches him and requests that he dines with him. Of course he is intrigued by the invitation and accepts. Once at dinner, Mr. Moustafa orders them all of the best cuisine for an exquisite dining experience just before he begins to reminisce on his time at The Grand Budapest Hotel.

At this time, not only does the time period and setting change, but so does the screen formatting. From that point on whenever the author of the book was narrating from the 1968 or 1985 time periods the screen was wide, but once Mr. Moustafa began to narrate the screen format was narrow. I have never seen anything like that happen in a movie before, but I liked it because it distinguished one time period and narrator from the other.

             Throughout the movie when the characters are traveling in outdoor settings through the town and mountains you can immediately tell that the backgrounds aren’t real. They have clearly been crafted and they were, by Annie Atkins who is a well-known graphic designer with an astounding talent. Atkins is responsible for the hand crafting of hundreds of backdrops and miniatures that really tie this film together. Some of the most noticed pieces she made were of the infamous Mendel’s pastries from the pastel pink and blue boxes, to the fancy little pastries, even the one that made it into the jail with tiny digging tools inside. My personal favorite props Atkins put an astounding amount of work into were the written out ones such as the newspapers, police report and passports.

              These might not seem like they would have a lot of detail put into them but that is where people are wrong. Whenever a newspaper is shown in the picture its main focus is a specific article, for example when Madame D. is murdered. What no one notices is everything else on the page that Annie Atkins created. In order to make it seem realistic she wrote fake articles relating to that time period and a weather report to go with it. The police report she created when Kovacs is murdered only is shown on screen for enough time to get a glimpse of it, but this also has ample detail imbedded. When you really get a good look Atkins wrote a conclusive report about how Kovacs died and there is a section with spaces for finger prints of all 10 fingers, but only 6 fingerprints are there since the other 4 were severed. Lastly Agathas passport looks so real it could pass as the real thing. The photo looks precise to one from the early 1900’s and is stamped complete with all of Agathas personal information such as birthday, height, and even under distinguishing features it says “birthmark on face shaped like Mexico”.

               When Annie Atkins was asked in an interview with Creative Review what her favorite piece she designed for the movie was she replied, “My absolute favorite piece is the book itself that opens the story. It's a modern pink hardback with a drawing of the hotel on the front, and the name of the movie as the hotel sign. It's a relatively simple piece, but it's really special having a prop that you made with the movie's name on it like that.” Earlier in the review I mentioned that this book is the first detailed piece you notice.

Kyle Smith from The New York Post wrote a review on the film, one of his statements being, “GBH is a featherweight screwball comedy that, trying mightily to be cosmopolitan, feels awfully provincial, desperately touristy: Europe is just this nutty place where a lot of crazy mixed-up stuff happened and look at this darling model ski lift! That’s Wes Anderson”. In my opinion these characteristics are what I like about it. The movie isn’t trying to be cosmopolitan, it is cosmopolitan, and who says that’s a bad thing? The movie has a lot of diversity which appeals to many different people. Giving the environment around the hotel a local feel gives it a more welcoming feel. I couldn’t imagine this movie having a big city setting, after all, the time period is in the early 1900’s when many European cities were still in the making. As for being “desperately touristy”, the movie IS based on a hotel, where tourists stay when they travel so being touristy also works for the movie.


The Grand Budapest Hotel shows grave amounts of detail that make this motion picture so astounding. I cannot express how much I adore everything about this movie from the directing to the meticulous artwork. Wes Anderson really chose well by Annie Atkins, this film would be nothing her keen eye for detail. Hopefully this duo will have many more masterpieces to come in the near future.